Random comment!
Oct. 13th, 2010 09:07 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I'm amazed at how much I'm enjoying Playful Kiss, especially considering I really had no desire to check it out in the beginning. But now I'm super invested. One complaint:
What was going on with the editing in episode 11? I never thought of PK as a drama that would make me question reality.
Also: I need for all the jdramas I'm watching to hurry up and get their subs by the end of the month. I will not be distracted from NaNo, dammit!
ETA: Female Character Flowchart - I figure most everyone has already seen this, but I thought I'd link it just in case. Funny how it seems pretty much every female character is a stereotype/trope/poorly written. Hilarious, really. It reminds me of an essay I read about the term "Mary-Sue" and how we need to stop using it. I wish I could find the link, because I'm really not going to be any good at giving the topic justice. Basically, it just serves to undermine female authors.
ETA Dos: Apparently I can't find the link because it's been locked, which is sad because I think everyone should read it. But
darkeyedwolf found a snippet of it over at Fanlore. Here's a short quote that I think represents the argument well:
What was going on with the editing in episode 11? I never thought of PK as a drama that would make me question reality.
Also: I need for all the jdramas I'm watching to hurry up and get their subs by the end of the month. I will not be distracted from NaNo, dammit!
ETA: Female Character Flowchart - I figure most everyone has already seen this, but I thought I'd link it just in case. Funny how it seems pretty much every female character is a stereotype/trope/poorly written. Hilarious, really. It reminds me of an essay I read about the term "Mary-Sue" and how we need to stop using it. I wish I could find the link, because I'm really not going to be any good at giving the topic justice. Basically, it just serves to undermine female authors.
ETA Dos: Apparently I can't find the link because it's been locked, which is sad because I think everyone should read it. But
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Writing "Mary Sues" is empowering. Writing them being awesome is empowering. Calling Mary Sue, and contributing to an environment such as the above, which encourages the denigration of female awesomeness in fiction, which encourages the bullying and harassment of participants in female awesome, is participating in that culture.
Calling "Mary Sue" in this environment is shaming women for empowering themselves.